Every distributor wants more artists and more labels. Very few think about what growth does to their standing with the stores until it is already damaged. The stores do not grade a distributor on how many releases it sends. They grade it on what those releases turn out to be: how many are infringing, how many are spam, how many attract artificial streams, and how many come back as complaints.
Growth that brings in bad catalogue is not growth. It is a liability that arrives with a delay.
The stores now charge for what you let through
This is no longer a reputation question alone. Since April 2024, Spotify has charged labels and distributors per track when it detects flagrant artificial streaming. The charge lands on the distributor, not on the artist who bought the fake streams, and a distributor that passes it on still has to collect it from someone who may already be gone.
Other consequences are harder to see and cost more: releases held for manual review, slower ingestion, and in the worst cases a store ending the relationship. A distributor's delivery relationship is its most valuable asset, and every new signing either protects it or spends some of it.
Vet who you sign, not just what they upload
The cheapest place to stop a problem is before the account exists. A few questions filter out most of the risk:
- Who owns the masters? An artist who cannot explain where their recordings came from, or a "label" whose whole catalogue appeared last month, is a rights dispute waiting to happen.
- What does the catalogue look like? Hundreds of near-identical tracks, generic titles, or white-noise and sleep audio from a new account are classic spam patterns.
- Where have they distributed before, and why did they leave? Artists removed by another distributor for fraud tend to move on to the next one.
- Is AI involved, and is it disclosed? Most stores accept AI-assisted music. What they act against is undisclosed AI music and AI music imitating a real artist.
None of this means turning people away by default. It means knowing who you are delivering for.
Check every release, every time
Vetting a signing once is not enough, because the catalogue keeps changing after the account is approved. Every release should pass through the same gate:
- Complete metadata and identifiers. No release goes out without a UPC, an ISRC on every track and a record label. Missing codes are the root of most matching and royalty problems later.
- Audio recognition. Scanning audio against a reference database catches uploads of recordings that belong to someone else before they reach a store.
- AI detection with disclosure. When a track is very likely AI-generated and the uploader has not said so, the release should go back for a disclosure instead of going out.
- A human decision at the end. Automated checks should inform the approval, not replace it.
Structure your roster so it can scale
Operational mess turns into trust problems too. A distributor handling several labels needs each one to exist as its own entity, with its own name, logo and profile, so the right label name appears on the right release in every store. If you sell services to your artists, the terms (how many releases a year, which features are included) should be enforced by the system rather than tracked in a spreadsheet and argued about later.
How ToneGrid is built for this
ToneGrid runs every release through a two-stage approval. A distributor's own admins review what their artists submit and pass it on. It then goes through ToneGrid's quality check before anything is delivered to a store:
- Every release is scanned for audio recognition through our ACRCloud integration, so recordings that match someone else's catalogue are caught before delivery.
- AI detection runs alongside disclosure. A release the detector flags as very likely AI-generated, with no AI disclosure filed, is sent back to the distributor with the reason, instead of being delivered.
- Final approval requires a UPC, an ISRC on every track and a record label. A release without them cannot be approved.
- Labels are first-class, each with its own name, logo and profile under the distributor's brand.
- Artist plans let a distributor sell its own plans to its artists, paid into the distributor's own payment account, with limits such as releases per year enforced automatically.
Growth is the point of running a distribution business. The job is making sure the catalogue you add is catalogue the stores are glad to receive.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a distributor be charged for its artists' fake streams?
Yes. Since April 2024, Spotify charges labels and distributors per track when it detects flagrant artificial streaming. The charge is applied to the distributor that delivered the track.
How should a music distributor vet new artists and labels?
Confirm who owns the masters, look at the shape of the catalogue for spam patterns, ask where they distributed before and why they left, and ask whether AI was used and whether it is disclosed.
Is AI-generated music allowed on streaming services?
Most stores accept AI-assisted music. What they act against is AI music that is not disclosed, or that imitates a real artist.
What checks should a release pass before delivery?
Complete metadata with a UPC, an ISRC on every track and a record label; audio recognition against existing catalogue; AI detection with disclosure; and a final human approval.
How do distributors manage multiple labels on one platform?
By setting each label up as its own entity with its own name and profile, so the correct label appears on each release in every store, and by enforcing any artist plan limits in the system.
Related reading: 12 Fraud Signals ToneGrid Watches, The Real Cost of Streaming Fraud for Distributors, How to Scale as an Independent Music Business.
Sources: Spotify for Artists: Artificial streaming. Corrections: support@tonegrid.pro.